[Release] MMOPro Official WoW Legion Repack (build 7.3.5.26972) with ProjectCMS

[jshigashi]

thanks

---

› See More: [Release] MMOPro Official WoW Legion Repack (build 7.3.5.26972) with ProjectCMS

[gelaoke8]

thanks

[BawdyCitrus]

Thanks! looking forward to playing around with this, as soon as I can figure it out.

[mtp1032]

I"ve unpacked the files and cannot find the "README!!" file. However, I can start the SQL, Battlenet, and the Worldserver. But when I launch the client (the 64 bit one), the code fails with the following Error note:

The CAS system was unable to initialize: ClientHandler initialization error: failed fetching the CDN configuration file.

My directory structure is exactly as I unpacked it:

..\WoW 7.3.5\
_server
Client_715
Repack

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious but in the absence of a readme or some similer doc, I am at a loss as to how to proceed.

Thanks,

[Baene]

How do i get this?

[civicacid]

No hay importa

[emavcr]

Thanks. Looking forward to test this. Keep the hard work on.

[zebutro]

thanks

[mtp1032]

"I've unpacked the files and cannot find the "README!!" file. However, I can start the SQL, Battlenet, and the Worldserver. But when I launch the client (the 64 bit one), the code fails with the following Error note:

The CAS system was unable to initialize: ClientHandler initialization error: failed fetching the CDN configuration file.

My directory structure is exactly as I unpacked it:

..\WoW 7.3.5\
_server
Client_715
Repack

I'm sure I'm missing something obvious but in the absence of a readme or some similer doc, I am at a loss as to how to proceed.

Thanks,"

Is there no one who can (or is willing to) respond to this request?

If you're reading this and have successfully installed this repack could you simply post the README file referred to above (or tell me where I can find it)?

Cheers,

[mtp1032]

Unfortunately, it does indeed look like this is rather shoddy work by whoever put it together. The information given is completely misleading.

Sadly, I agree. I don't believe that all these replies thanking the dev for his wonderful work are valid. This is really incompetent work, vis, documentation. Maybe this works but I challenge anybody in this thread to prove that they've got this up and running.